Monday, March 10, 2008

Proposal Argument

Gun control is an age old debate that his revitilazed with recent school shootings at Northern Illinois University. Students are coming into their schools with guns to kill everyone. Lawmakers are looking for a solution to this. Should America allow guns on campuses, so students can protect themselves?

Guns should just be banned. Leave the old way of checking a person's background for only criminal records or problems. Ban guns from being accessible to any citizens with the exception to goverment staff like the police.

If guns were banned it would be harder for killers to get possession of one. With guns being difficult to possess school shootings and the likliness of it happening decreases. People may still be able to get guns from the black market, but the likliness of killers being able to get one is lower compared to the faulty system of checking a person's background when purchasing a gun.


Stock issue 1: Is there really a problem here that needs to be solved?
School shootings is a collasal problem. With the life of children and teenagers, society's future, at stake we need to do whatever we can to protect them.

Stock issue 2: Will the proposed solution really solve this problem?
The banning of guns will limit many killers from getting their hands on a gun. There is still the aspect of them going to the black market to get guns, but the probability of them doing that is lower then the current background check system.

Stock issue 3: Can the problem be solved more simply without disturbing the status quo?
No the problem can not be solved without disturbing the status quo because it would require change throughout the country. Gun shops would have to close down and new laws would need to pass.

Stock issue 4: Is the proposed solution really pracical? Does it stand a chance of actually being enacted?
It is feasible because America has passed huge laws with banning before like the Prohibition Act. It has a high chance of being enacted just like when the Prohibition Act was in effect.

Stock issue 5: What will be the unforseen positive and negative consequences of the proposal?
The positive effects will be lower crime and death rates because robbers would not have a gun to threaten people. The negative effects is the closing of gun shops with people being out of jobs. People will also look more into the black market for their gun needs.

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

"Let it Enfold You"

An implicit argument is basically an indirect claim. A reader has to look deeply for the true meaning the author incorporated into the work.

Charles Bukowski's "Let It Enfold You" contains many implicit arguments. A person should be optimistic, have faith in others, be forgiving, appreciate the simple things in life, and don't take things for granted and they will be rewarded for it. The person in the poem is rewarded with a peaceful life and a wife for being a kind person.

The poem begins with a man hating everything and trusting no one. He finally has an epiphany and sees the error of his ways through viewing others exactly like him. Bukowski implies that people can find errors within themselves by viewing another's error like theirs. The man later grows tired of taking advantage of "poor drunken female"; the poem is impling that people should not take advantage of others in that state because it is like sinking to a whole new level of "low". When the man is fired by his boss the man is understanding. When the man says, "it's all right", his tone is kind with no presence of anger or hatred. Near the end of the poem the man has a wife showing his kind nature payed off in the end. When the man honked at the mailman the mailman waved back shows that being kind to a person will have them be kind back.